I still haven’t figured out how to make a firewall rule with slaac on pfsense, with an ISP that hands out addresses at random. It’s my understanding’s slaac is the “right” way to do things, not dhcp and reservations.

Granted, it’s been a minute since I tried so I don’t remember the issues, but as I recall, when ipv6 prefix changes, device gets new IP (and it seems not just the prefix part. I can get the firewall to register IPs into DNS and use a dns based firewall rule, but unbound restarts and blows out its cache when a device joins the network. And there another part to it but it’s all gone fuzzy.

Interesting; it should work that way because the hash should check out fine. But I’ve never tried.

If you’ve moved or renamed files, it will break the seed; as far as the client is concerned, the file no longer exists. If the seeding app hasn’t noticed, it hasn’t done a check of the files and/or hasn’t tried seeding them. The other thing to try is to point it one level up or down from where you “think” the data is.

Is this like the Apple car? Just around the corner?

It’s absolutely insane to me that people actively agitate against that idea and get upset when the leopards burn their house down.

I do too. But these shitlords and others decided they’re better than paying taxes, and then complain when they don’t get the benefits of living in a society.

The fee should just be automatic and reflect the cost. $3500 to respond isn’t much.

$75

$75 is what would have saved their house.

$75 is less than I pay per month for home insurance on a smaller residence than the one described.

The firefighters have to draw a line in the sand at some point.

Communal services cost money. When enough people decide they don’t need to spend the $75 annual fee to support their communal firefighting service, it will collapse. The “morally right” thing to do is to put the fire out. But be morally right thing to do is pay the damn $75 in the first place. It’s just like people who choose not to join the union and enjoy the raises. Then get fired, because “right to work.”

Realtek, don’t they have issues with drivers in FreeBSD? Or am I horribly out of date.

In any case I’m excited, even if i barely tap into 1gbe capability most of the time.

People who work in research often have their whole life built around their specific field of research, to the point where their transferable skills and knowledge are minimized or excluded. Financially, they’re usually dependent on the institution they work for to a far greater degree than most professions are, which is part of why tenure exists. They also—but certainly not always—are neurodivergent. Their area of research is necessarily something they’re passionate about.

I can totally see this happening. There’s a lot going on in the world right now. Many people are experiencing extreme anxiety about world events they don’t have power over.

Being personally bullied by the government specifically about the work that is tremendously personally important would be devastating.

I think a moderately competent lawyer would be able to build a case. Of course, it would get tied up in court for a while, but protecting IP is a big part of IP law (more on trademark I think, but IANAL). The C&D should have been sent a long time ago. It’s possible that this is a department that’s “moving fast and breaking things” and higher-ups said no to the license. In no way should that be considered to excuse the behaviour.

This depends entirely on what you want to run. A pihole needs vastly different resources than for example offering jellyfin to 20 simultaneous users. Both can be hosted at home.

Ohhh maybe they need steel from one of their plants outside USA?

Without giving the tangerine tyrant any credit, is it not possible that they took this opportunity to blame tariffs for idling the plant? With strong unions, companies do need to fish more when their reason amounts to “our profits are down 0.01%”. To me, that’s what this sounds like.

Is that the same lane-keeping that Full-Self-Drives into concrete barriers? https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/08/tech/tesla-trial-wrongful-death-walter-huang

I don’t think they can, because they’re suffering so much from the rectal-cranial inversion that Musk started with his FSD.

Muskrat insists on using computer vision entirely, and building it in-house. Tesla (probably EM) as I recall also insulted MobilEye so they refuse to do business with them. Mind you, I think lane keeping is generally a computer vision problem.

It’s absolutely pitiful that they can’t figure out lane-keeping when a cars a fraction of the price have it.

It’s also a huge red flag that they are shipping “self driving” but can’t do lane keep assist.