mechoman444

Many city’s don’t allow neon at all. ☹️

Yes of course but it’s marketing data.

Marketing data. We need it for marketing to people so they can spend money.

Don’t you understand! Marketing data!!!

Pervertube. Thisvid. Motherless.

I just realized indicating these websites might have revealed a little too much about the kinds of porn I like to watch. ☹️

Absolute moron. You absolute moron. Once again my argument is about nationalizing a private company.

Is there anything that you’d like to talk about concerning that!

I don’t give two flying fucks who runs space x. Once again. I’m not defending Elon in anyway.

I am expressing my concern about the United States government nationalizing a private company. You’re still making bassless assumptions. Pull your head out of your own ass and actually think about what I’m saying before spouting off at the mouth.

I’m sorry were you talking to me? Because nothing in your response had anything to do with what I actually said.

I never claimed to like Elon. I don’t. I never expressed support for this administration’s policies. I don’t.

My argument is about the moral, ethical, and historically dangerous precedent of nationalizing a private company.

That drug-addled sycophant stood before the most powerful political body on Earth wearing a baseball cap and a T-shirt while the Vice President of the United States told President Zelensky to put on a suit.

Unbelievable.

Where the hell do you get off making wild, baseless assumptions about things you barely understand? What exactly prevents you from engaging in civil discourse like an adult, instead of spouting off like you did in that comment?

Fine if we’re slinging assumptions now, here’s mine: You strike me as a fedora-wearing, vape-huffing, woman-hating neckbeard. Am I wrong? Don’t care. That’s the image your words paint.

If the government actually nationalized SpaceX, the precedent would be insane. You’d be telling every private company working in defense, infrastructure, or tech that if they become too essential, the government might just take it. Doesn’t matter how much risk or capital they fronted.

SpaceX isn’t just launching rockets for fun—it’s practically a branch of the U.S. space program at this point. GPS, Starlink for military comms, launching classified payloads, putting astronauts in orbit. If we nationalize that over a political pissing match between Trump and Musk, we’re basically saying innovation is conditional on obedience.

And let’s be honest—once you do this to SpaceX, you open the door to doing it to AWS, Tesla’s energy grid systems, Google’s AI infrastructure. Any private company that gets too important suddenly becomes “too critical to stay private.” That’s a fast track to killing private innovation in sectors where we need it most.

If Trump’s threatening funding, and Musk is threatening to walk, and the public’s response is “just take the company,” then we’ve officially politicized the tech-industrial base. That’s not governance, that’s dysfunction.

Nationalizing SpaceX would be a Cold War move in a modern economy. It might feel good in the moment, but long-term, it’s a terrible idea.

The precedent that will set and the implications… No… We should not do this.

Youtube ads? I have no clue what you’re talking about…

“other means”

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

I have this terrible urge to hurdle insults at you but I refrain because I don’t feel like dealing with mods.

No. He’s not right. Not at all. The reason that you and the other person think you’re right is because you’re ignorant you haven’t studied history and the only reason you sound so confident is because you ate a dunning Kruger sandwich.

What you are is effectively a religious manuscript writer during the time of Gutenberg when he invented the printing press. The machine was called heresy because it would have removed the power from the clergy or so they thought in any case.

Any sufficiently impactful technology will create people like you that push against it mostly due to fear of some kind.

Notable technology breakthrough met with severe skepticism include things like electricity the automobile and vaccines.

There are a very very few manuscript writers left in the world because of the printing press yet here we are nevertheless.

Bing? People use Bing?

The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. - Stephen Hawking

The fact that you keep calling llm’s AI simply indicate your ignorance as to what you’re even talking about.

They’re not copying brush Strokes they’re creating their own.

You have no idea how these things work what they are or even what they do you’re just on the bandwagon hating these tools for reasons that you don’t even understand yourself.

If you’re so upset with all this stuff go live in a Luddite community or something.

Copy

1. noun a. an imitation, transcript, or reproduction of an original work (such as a letter, a painting, a table, or a dress) b. one of a series of especially mechanical reproductions of an original impression c. matter to be set especially for printing; also: something considered printable (such as an advertisement or news story)

2. verb a. to make a copy or copies of b. to model oneself on c. to transfer (data, text, etc.) from one location to another, especially in computing

I can’t believe I just had to provide you with a definition of the word copy.

Are you freaking serious!!!

Being inspired by and creating an original production is not the same as copying if that original work is inspired by other artists!!!

By your definition of copying because Elvis Presley was inspired by Muddy Waters they made the exact same music!

LLMs don’t produce copyrighted material they take inspiration from the training data so to speak. They create original productions.

In the same way that you can envision the Mona Lisa in your head but you couldn’t paint it by hand.

No. And that’s the point…

This is 100% correct. You can downvote this person all you want but their not wrong!

A painter doesn’t own anything to the estate of Rembrandt because they took inspiration from his paintings.