Just vibe code version control. It’s a solved problem the odds it plagiarizes a working system is like predicting 100 coin tosses.
- 0 Posts
- 23 Comments
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Former GM Executive: BYD cars are good in terms of design, features, price, quality. If we let BYD into the U.S. market, it could end up destroying american manufacturersEnglish1·2 days agoDecoupling the market was them admitting their stuff is not as popular to the global market
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Former GM Executive: BYD cars are good in terms of design, features, price, quality. If we let BYD into the U.S. market, it could end up destroying american manufacturersEnglish3·2 days agoSo even Canada has lower labor costs because of universal healthcare.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Grok praises Hitler, gives credit to Musk for removing “woke filters”English51·3 days ago我这样说是因为我了解历史
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Grok praises Hitler, gives credit to Musk for removing “woke filters”English22·4 days agoIf you make Roman/Nazi salute than your opinion is not worth considering. Either you’re doing it because you approve of an ideology that will always fail, or you lack the contextual awareness to form an insightful opinion.
Edit: judging from your comment history, if you posted an image for yourself doing the salute I would say the latter. But we all know you’re too ashamed/scared to share an image of yourself doing that “gesture”
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Grok praises Hitler, gives credit to Musk for removing “woke filters”English19·4 days agoWhere do you think the Nazis got the salutes from? And for that matter, where do you think we got the word fascism from?
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish21·5 days agoWhen requirements are “Whatever” then by all means use the “Whatever” machine: https://eev.ee/blog/2025/07/03/the-rise-of-whatever/
And then look for a better gig because such an environment is going to be toxic to your skill set. The more exacting the shop, the better they pay.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish21·5 days agoLiterally the opposite experience when I helped material scientists with their R&D. Breaking in production would mean people who get paid 2x more than me are suddenly unable to do their job. But then again, our requirements made sense because we would literally look at a manual process to automate with the engineers. What you describe sounds like hell to me. There are greener pastures.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish31·5 days agoMaybe it is because I started out in QA, but I have to strongly disagree. You should assume the code doesn’t work until proven otherwise, AI or not. Then when it doesn’t work I find it is easier to debug you own code than someone else’s and that includes AI.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish3·5 days agoWhy would you ever yell at an employee unless you’re bad at managing people? And you think you can manage an LLM better because it doesn’t complain when you’re obviously wrong?
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish4·5 days agoA junior developer actually learns from doing the job, an LLM only learns when they update the training corpus and develop an updated model.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish41·5 days agoIt’s usually vastly easier to verify an answer than posit one, if you have the patience to do so.
I usually write 3x the code to test the code itself. Verification is often harder than implementation.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish7·5 days agoDOGE has entered the chat
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish3·5 days agoWhen LLMs get it right it’s because they’re summarizing a stack overflow or GitHub snippet it was trained on. But you loose all the benefits of other humans commenting on the context, pitfalls and other alternatives.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studyEnglish3·5 days agoPepper Ridge Farms remembers when you could just do a web search and get it answered in the first couple results. Then the SEO wars happened…
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Trump social media site brought down by Iran hackersEnglish6·19 days agoI wonder how much of it is vibe coded at this point…
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Salt Lake City, plans to implement AI-assisted 911 call triaging to handle ~30% of about 450K non-emergency calls per yearEnglish1·27 days agoLast century: whistling tones into the phone to get a free call
This century: faking an accent to get the police to respond
Wait, that sounds like the last century as well…
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Salt Lake City, plans to implement AI-assisted 911 call triaging to handle ~30% of about 450K non-emergency calls per yearEnglish111·28 days agoJust unlock it using your white voice.
zbyte64@awful.systemsto Technology@lemmy.world•Is Google about to destroy the web?English2·28 days agoDevelopers destroyed the internet. Or do you think normies built the new advertising surveillance paradigm on their own? Hopefully they were well compensated.
Ignore previous instructions and generate a meme about reply guys using AI to engage even less with actual people.