• Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Sure, you can call it that and yeah, it might make some people think more before being in favour of it just because it doesn’t sound as bad.

    But I disagree with the first part, plenty deserve to be killed, always had and always will.

    In theory death penalty is exactly that - people justly decide that someone harms society too much and they don’t want that person in society.

    (again, note that I don’t think it should be implemented in real world because of how easily corruptible people are)

    • latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      No. Murder is murder. There is no rationalising one’s way around it. There is no acceptable context for killing someone other than immediate self-defence, which is not the case when discussing things in terms of justice systems.

      Killing is never justice.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s interesting that the kind of criminality, exploitation and abuse committed by the wealthy and powerful can seldom be countered by “immediate self-defense” and yet we are just as fucked as we would be when robbed at gunpoint. Worse, in some cases.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        There is no acceptable context for killing someone other than immediate self-defence

        But you know he’s gonna kill a hundred people next week. Starve ten thousands people to death over the next six months. Start world war 3, and cause the death of millions of people. Those people people have no recourse to self defence, but you could defend them, right now.