• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh yeah sure.

    “This model could enable the manufacturing of biological weapons, anyway here it is”. A totally believable and not at all marketing BS statment from openai, winner of the most inappropriately named country in the world award.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh yeah? Well, my upcoming AI models pose a higher risk of enabling the discovery of the location of the long-lost Ark of the Covenant, which would [allegedly] make ones armies invincible and impervious to biological weapons.

    Invest now!

  • brendansimms@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Our default behavior for the general public will intentionally err on the side of caution, by training models to provide high-level insights that support expert understanding while withholding sufficient detail to prevent novice misuse.” — So users have to have a premium subscription for bioweapons development assistance?

  • seven_phone@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t understand the emphasis on biology, it is a potential area of concern admittedly but only one of a great many. It sounds like someone’s personal idiosyncratic fear of disease.

    • Mark with a Z@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because “biological weapons development” sounds a d v a n c e d

      Warning: our product can be used for advanced high tech work!!!11