Prominent backbench MP Sarah Champion launched a campaign against VPNs previously, saying: “My new clause 54 would require the Secretary of State to publish, within six months of the Bill’s passage, a report on the effect of VPN use on Ofcom’s ability to enforce the requirements under clause 112.

"If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems.” And the Labour Party said there were “gaps” in the bill that needed to be amended.

  • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Yeah, businesses will not accept this. Remote work and remote connections rely on VPN for ALL KINDS OF SHIT. If you must adhere to some kinds of government compliance, it is even MANDATED BY THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT. Explain to me how the hell that is going to just poof and not cause all kinds of problems.

  • npcknapsack@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    20 hours ago

    People are “at risk”… of what? What a terrible article to not even clarify what the risk is. Because it sounds to me like the government is who put those people at risk by making them go look for solutions to a draconian policy.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    Funny how its always so important to ban useful and empowering things for citizens in the name of safety but someone we can’t ban business practices that cause mass extinctions, change the climate, impoverish the working class or kill enough of us to only be seen as a statistic instead of people. If they actually cared about safety, they would be banning the things that cause mass suffering and death, not VPNs. We should be opposed to these kinds of bans on the principle that it further disempowered us so we are less able to deal with the threats of all the mass suffering and death that they refuse to keep us safe from.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    To me it looks like every government in the world is pro-surveillance and anti-privacy; they’re just all at different stages of depth into those ideologies done in practice. Privacy and anti-surveillance against foreign governments and corporations, pro for domestic. And I continue decade after decade to say that you should fear your domestic government far more than any foreign unless you’re a country that may have US and allies bombing/droning and paratrooping your country. Countries with a modern enough military mostly have to worry about their own government rather than foreign governments

  • TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    this is obviously such a dumpster fire that I can’t help but wonder, “When will they realize how dumb this is and back out of it?”

    then i remember that Brexit happened

    fuckin stubbornness is a national identity for you blokes innit

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    If VPNs cause significant issues, the Government must identify those issues and find solutions, rather than avoiding difficult problems

    Your law is the difficult problem you daft cunt

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    You cant ban vpns, its easy for tech people to set up a vpn server on any server on the internet and connect to it. Wireguard for example, super simple.

  • rozodru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    for those in the UK and/or Other places in Europe just know it’s so painfully easy to either set up your own VPN or just use something like Mullvad.

    I set up my own VPN this morning for the first time on my server and it took less than 10minutes. plenty of guides online on how to do it.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The linked story has been updated. The headline now reads:

    Labour rules out VPN ban in UK but issues warning to UK households

    Labour won’t ban the use of Virtual Private Networks

    And the story begins:

    Labour has ruled out a possible VPN ban after reports thousands of UK households were at risk following the Online Safety Act kicking in under the government. Labour Party Tech Secretary Peter Kyle has revealed that the Government is “not considering a VPN ban” - after reports in Guido Fawkes suggested it was possible.

  • TheOrionArm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How is this even feasible? People need them for work, business, school etc. The UK is going nuts with the attempts to regulate the internet.

  • MissingGhost@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if we all started using I2P for most stuff? The governments couldn’t do anything about it.