

Because luddism is good. But this article aint it.
Because luddism is good. But this article aint it.
You mean it’s not the genocide, exploitation, imperialism, etc? It’s just social media? Peak capitalist apologism.
I’m pretty far down the luddite/makhaevist wormhole… But this is just a garbage idea.
There is no other economic system.
And “greed” isn’t really the problem with capitalism. It’s more about the violent deprivation of human needs in order to exploit people for the extreme privilege of a tiny minority. Etc.
They might as well take it down since the dems never do shit except serve capital, auto/oil cartels, etc.
That’s literally how we got here. If it weren’t for liberal fascism, somebody might have attacked these disgusting polluters. Maybe defund their disinformation, politicians, ben shapiro, etc… No chance. They consistently do the opposite.
Yes but that’s not really a problem like the overwhelming fascism.
Intention: YouTubers can stop with the whole self censoring shit.
lol. that’s not the intention.
It depends on who is being targeted.
If you make a video calling for attacks on women, palestinians, gay people, etc., that’s all good!
If you talk about taxing rich people, that’s extreme violence. Immediate ban.
“Free speech” under capitalism means the freedom to promote fascism, rascism, misogyny, homophobia, genocide, etc…
But if you post half a second of a Disney movie, your account will be permanently deleted.
jimmy dore lmao. imagine getting your politics from a shitty youtube “comedian”.
Don’t buy into the grifts. Dismantle them.
“AI” is a pseudo-scientific grift.
Perhaps more importantly, the underlying technologies (like any technology) are already co-opted by the state, capitalism, imperialism, etc. for the purposes of violence, surveillance, control, etc.
Sure, it’s cool for a chatbot to summarize stackexchange but it’s much less cool to track and murder people while committing genocide. In either case there is no “intelligence” apart from the humans involved. “AI” is primarily a tool for terrible people to do terrible things while putting the responsibility on some ethereal, unaccountable “intelligence” (aka a computer).
“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“paradise”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”“”
The difference between reasoning models and normal models is reasoning models are two steps,
That’s a garbage definition of “reason”. Someone who is not a grifter would simply call them two-step models (or similar), instead of promoting misleading anthropomorphic terminology.
The funny thing about this “AI” griftosphere is how grifters will make some outlandish claim and then different grifters will “disprove” it. Plenty of grant/VC money for everybody.
Cars are horses. How do you feel about statement?
It’s just the internet plus some weighted dice. Nothing to be afraid of.
Sure, these grifters are shady AF about their wacky definition of “reason”… But that’s just a continuation of the entire “AI” grift.
So you used to hang out with your friends and share articles and comment on them in person then upvote/downvote and moderate? ok sure whatever you say…